Date: 24 March, 2019
Nets: 130m
Sound: None
Weather: 4C rising to
15C
Ringers: CS and EB
March’s first session
was technically a tad after middle March, but never mind! The previous three weeks of windy, rainy,
snowy, stormy weather had induced ringer’s frustration in us but did not
prevent us from delighting in some seasonal changes in Meisen Wood. It is wonderful how seasonal changes flow,
with increasing intensity, into each other. This fluidity is often marked by sublime
juxtapositions: the initially slow opening of leaf buds greening the forest; the
nocturnal peeping of migrating Redwing flocks contrasting to the trilling
evening song of recently arrived Song Thrushes.
And future seasons are heralded by such moments as: clouds of golden-green
hazel pollen drifting on the wind and will hopefully result in a good nut crop
next autumn.
This seasonal shift
was reflected in today’s catch: a mix of Brambling and Chaffinch with Firecrest
and Song Thrush; and a few other beauties for good measure.
Species
|
Ringed
|
Retrapped
|
Totals
|
Blackbird
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Blue
Tit
|
6
|
13
|
19
|
Brambling
|
9
|
4
|
13
|
Chaffinch
|
19
|
19
|
|
Dunnock
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Firecrest
|
3
|
3
|
|
Goldcrest
|
1
|
1
|
|
Great
spotted Woodpecker
|
1
|
1
|
|
Great
Tit
|
3
|
10
|
13
|
Greenfinch
|
2
|
2
|
|
Hawfinch
|
1
|
1
|
|
Marsh
Tit
|
1
|
1
|
|
Middle
spotted Woodpecker
|
1
|
1
|
|
Nuthatch
|
2
|
2
|
|
Robin
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Siskin
|
4
|
4
|
|
Song
Thrush
|
1
|
1
|
|
Wren
|
1
|
1
|
|
Totals
|
53
|
37
|
90
|
Bramblings have,
surprisingly to us, been present all winter though in the last couple of weeks
their numbers have been gradually declining.
The nine new Bramblings included three males whose plumage was close to
their stunning full summer attire. Throughout the month the number of Chaffinch
have been increasing and slowly surpassing those of Brambling; one day last
week we estimated 120 Chaffinch coming to the feeders. So ringing nineteen new Chaffinches was very
pleasing and interesting. The interest was
in their weights and fat scores: several of these finches weighed 25g and had
fat scores of 5 and 6, indicating these to be migrating individuals.
Greenfinch numbers
have been increasing slowly through the month but have not reached their usual
numbers; two new is a low figure for this time of year. Hopefully this is not symptomatic of another
problem; though this indicative role is a valuable contribution that ringing
makes to ecological studies.
Song Thrush and
Firecrest are two visiting birds we strongly associate with spring and summer;
this is clearly shown in the Firecrest’s German name: Sommergoldhähnchen –
summer’s golden bird. Both species nest
within the wood and unfortunately, though somewhat perversely interesting, we
often witness male Firecrests aggressively displaying at their own images in
some of our windows.
Normally a Hawfinch
would be the star bird of any ringing session.
This strikingly coloured finch with a powerful bill – able to crack open
hard seeds, as indicated in its German name: Kernbeißer – nutcracker. Yes that has caused some momentary high
excitement in CS when EB has announced that a nutcracker is in the net – the
delights of mistranslation! Usually we
catch about ten per annum, mostly in March or April.
To paraphrase Orwell:
all birds are beautiful but some birds are more beautiful than others. Particularly when it is a new bird for the
site which is also a red listed species: Middle – spotted Woodpecker
(MISWO). The pleasure in ringing this
bird was not because of its rarity value (okay we don’t believe that either as
less than 30 of this species are ringed annually in the Heligoland scheme), but
its capture does represent other important ornithological values.
According to the
recent Nordrhein-Westfalen Breeding Atlas the nearest breeding MISWO are
approximately 40km from here where the breeding population was estimated to be
a single pair. Since the Atlas’s
publication a couple of papers have stated that the MISWO population was
probably underestimated as surveys using playback lures have indicated the
presence of a few more pairs; but still at a good distance from us.
The Atlas’s authors
note that in the last thirty to forty years the MISWO has shown a slow range
extension. The authors cautiously
applaud this range extension but attach a somewhat damning caveat to why the
species remains on the red list of animals of conservation concern. MISWO’s habitat preference is for forest with
a good mix of deciduous trees, particularly oak and beech, including dead
trees. And the caveat applies to the
forestry industry’s reckless, and illegal, clearing of dead trees from their
plantations. It is very perplexing why
this illegal forestry practice has not been prosecuted! Aging and sexing MISWOs is not straight
forward. Demongin gives an interesting
equation using several discriminating factors for sexing Swiss MISWOs.
So, the value of
capturing this MISWO: it gives definitive confirmation of the species in the
area; if this indicates a continuation of the species’ range expansion is for
later confirmation. Hopefully
recapturing this individual, or another, in the next few months could
potentially indicate breeding i.e., presence of a cloacal protuberance or brood
patch; and with that the other biometrics we took could be most useful in
aiding our knowledge of aging and sexing this species. An exciting prospect!